Update: 3.37pm HK time, online. Finally. Q&A will go on if there is anyone online at the time.
I am experiencing a MAJOR BUG with Facebook at the moment which makes the Q&A impossible to conduct.
Update: 3.37pm HK time, online. Finally. Q&A will go on if there is anyone online at the time.
I am experiencing a MAJOR BUG with Facebook at the moment which makes the Q&A impossible to conduct.
A quick post on the story I posted on my FB page about the Hindenburg Omen which suggests the US is in for a Double Dip recession.
Disclaimer: I am not an economist. I have some economic knowledge but I am not a trained economist. This is not to be construed as economic/financial/stock market advice in any way.
It coincides with a question by a friend about why he got into a car accident on a Ji You 己 酉 day, rather than the Wu Shen 戊 申 day before (his chart has a Tiger, hence the inclination towards the Horse Carriage Disaster). I rattled off my explaination as he seemed to be under the impression that the Monkey was the peak of the Metal season (it’s not) and that although it would SEEM that we have to be concerned about the Jia Shen 甲 申 month (since it is a Fan Yin with the Geng Yin 庚 寅 year), we arguably have to be worried about Yi You 乙 酉 month as well.
Here’s my theory (and it ties in also with the Double Dip recession idea)
First of all, Jia Shen 甲 申 hasn’t exactly been uneventful. We have one major plane crash, and last I checked, half of Pakistan and a good part of China is under water at the moment. And the Chinese whispers about how the economy DOESN’T seem to be going where it should have really started to emerge this month. So Jia Shen 甲 申 is bringing its effect without a doubt. Also, my friend failed to realise that since he already was expecting the Monkey to wield the ax, he had been EXTRA careful driving this month. Let’s just say this is a guy who likes to think he’s living The Fast and the Furious on a daily basis in his car, and this month, he has been Driving Miss Daisy.
But in a sense, it can be argued that Jia Shen is the appetizer or amuse bouche to the Metal x Wood effect that characterises this year. Yi You is when things will really kick in for two reasons:
The peak of Metal is actually in You – this is the Cardinal of the Metal season, and thus when Metal Qi is at its purest.
Coincidentally also the chart of the year shows Yi You in the 3 quarter:

Together, these provide a high probability that something major is going to happen in September.If you look at the pattern of the chart above, it has indications of a Double Dip Recession. Per Wiki: “A W-shaped recession or “double dip” recession, occurs when the economy has a recession, emerges from the recession with a short period of growth, but quickly falls back into recession“.
Now, if we look at the chart above, Q1 is marked by Geng Yin 庚 寅, Q2 is marked by Wu Yin 戊 寅, Q3 is marked by Yi You乙 酉 , and Q4 is marked by Ji Mao 己 卯. Of all these four pillars, it could be argued that Wu Yin 戊 寅 is the only pillar that is suggestive of some form of Stability since Earth appears on top. In all of the other three pillars, you have some form of negative effect going on – Geng Yin 庚 寅 is known as a Head Chopping Feet pillar, Yi You 乙 酉 in itself suggests betrayal or deceit since Yi and Xin are antagonistic by nature, and although Ji Mao 己 卯implies some measure of stability, bear in mind that it is right next to the stabbing You.
If one translates all that into a sort of ‘economic’ forecast (i see a ‘W’ but most people probably would argue I’m seeing too much into it), what you see is volatility in Q1, some measure of stability in Q2, with Jia trying to break through Wu – hard and tough, but suggestive of ‘TRYING’, and then in Q3, it is every man for himself (expect the markets to exhibit both predatory and fickle behaviour at the same time, and lots of speculation) and Q4 marks some attempt to bring back stability BUT there is no trust in the market (Ji Mao 己 卯 is Ji seated on it’s own 7 Killings, and let’s not forget the Rooster next door to the Mao).
Consider that Q3 is marked by Yi You and we have a Yi You month coming up, and that traditionally September and October are always the worst months for the stock market, emergence of a Double Dip recession seems very likely.
Of course, there is also ultimately the overall fact that the year has no Water, and Water is considered to be an indicator of activity and movement in the economy. Those who have taken a peak at 2011′s chart will also note that the first 3 quarters of 2011 also contain no water, and water only comes in at the end of Q4 2011.
Addendum:
Barring unexpected circumstances, I will most likely run the FB Q&A sessions regularly now at the same time. Now that everyone has seen the first run, look forward to interacting more with people through the FB Q&A sessions.
A few things about tomorrow’s session.
The Q&A will be conducted via the Comments section. So I will indicate the Q&A is starting by posting in the Status Update session and you can post your questions into the Comments box. So that I know you’re addressing your question to me and not the audience, please prefix your question with @Baziqueen
On the types of questions, the usual caveats apply. NO PERSONAL QUESTIONS about your charts. I am not here to give free advice unless the question is UBER SIMPLE (which naturally does not exist in the world of BaZi when it comes to personal questions).
Technical questions of course about charts are fine. However, you might need to be a bit specific regarding the details. So please provide a DM and Season reference before asking your question.
It is utterly and totally pointless to ask a generic question (there are very few such questions in BaZi) without referencing the Day Master. So don’t ask questions that are ‘general’ because there’s no such thing as a general question when you are trying to evaluate something about the chart.
ie: Someone posted this on the FB comments section: An unrooted weak DM with strong resource and strong wealth, should we just focus on strengthening the DM element as the tipping point of balance?
The correct answer to this question is how long is a piece of string?
It depends. What is the DM? Does the DM use Resource well? How can Resource and Wealth both be strong, it’s possible, but I need to see the chart to know for sure this evaluation is correct. Balance can be achieved in many ways – and ultimately, IT COMES BACK TO THE DM.
So please ask specific questions. And provide concrete examples. Questions of the ‘what if’ waffly variety will get you no answers and simply can’t yield any answers anyway.
The other reason for asking for a DM and Season is to confirm that you have actually READ the chart correctly. There are many times when people offer up a question on Strength/Weakness for example, and they have it completely round their necks because they quite simply, have evaluated the chart wrongly (common problem: don’t look at HIDDEN STEMS).
Looking forward to doing Q&A tomorrow!
I wanted to finish reading Elizabeth Gilbert’s book before writing about her chart. I’m a few more chapters away from finishing but it’s enough to inform this post. The book was something I picked up after watching the trailer for Eat Pray Love (released this week, starring Julia Roberts) and I’ve been reading it since. After reading the 1st section of her book (the Italy section, or Eat section), I was intrigued to find out her chart simply because I was dying to know if my theory about her chart panned out.
In the first section ‘Eat’, Gilbert spends a lot of time talking about the failure of her marriage, the challenges she faced in dealing with her husband (who she wrote was a nice man but turned nasty when the divorce happened) and how she found herself entirely reluctant to have children. Looking back at the book, this is the timeline that I can see:
Age 31 (year 2000 – Geng Chen 庚 辰) – Gilbert by her own account realises that she does not want to have children or be married to her spouse. (I am paraphrasing – please read the book to get her ‘actual account’).
Age 32 (year 2001 – Xin Si 辛 巳) – she leaves her husband, goes into a relationship with David.
Age 33 (year 2002 – Ren Wu 壬 午) – she leaves David. Goes to Bali. Meets the medicine man who tells her she will lose, and make back a chunk of money.
Age 34 (year 2003 – Gui Wei 癸 未) – her divorce is finally settled, and Gilbert is able to proceed to Italy around September 2003. This is when she commences her journey that takes her to Italy, India and Bali following receipt of an advance from her publisher for the book on her travels. Her trip stretches into 2004, the year of Jia Shen 甲 申. At the end of the book, it is revealed that she meets someone (for those of you who watched the movie, played by Javier Bardem).
Age 36 (year 2006 – Bing Xu) – Eat Pray Love is published and very well received, and has to date spent 158 weeks on the NY times bestseller list.
So, with these details/facts in mind, let us consider the chart in light of some of her issues.
Finding God
This is something that comes up a lot in the first few chapters of the book. The need for religion or at least, the issue of religion offering comfort is obvious to most students of BaZi. This chart is extremely hot, and needs water, which is the Resource Star. Resource as we know represents comfort, but also co-relates with religion or superstition.
Now, in the three pillars that we have, there is no water. Although one has to assume there is water in the chart, this is arguable. If one looks back at her career, she got her start in 1997 when Esquire published her short story, which then led to a steady stream of work after that. She was in her Gui You Luck Pillar at the time, and it was Gui You year. The year before was Ren Shen – water was clearly very strong in those two years. The next major work came in 1997 (Ding Chou year), when GQ published a story that went on to be the basis for the film Coyote Ugly. So most of her opportunities coincided with the water years.
Further, her sudden change in her attitude towards her relationship notably took place when she entered a Luck Pillar without any water, and after two years of Wood (Tiger and Rabbit years).
It’s possible that there’s no water in the chart although unlikely given her level of success, it would have been hard to achieve that without any Resource Stars, which represent Helpful People. The more likely possibility is the Jia Xu Luck Pillar simply served to make the fire in her chart more intense (note the partial Wu-Xu combination), thus making the Water all the more important, hence, the intensified and sudden realisation of the need for religion, god or some kind of religious compass.
By backwards engineering the information about her chart, and her life, is highly likely in my view, that the hour of Birth is either Ox or Dragon. The Hour has to be something that the Dog can clatter into to release the Water for her to find her religious or spiritual moment. This is derived from the fact that she had her eureka religious moment very much when she was at the lowest point in her life, which is the sort of situation that relates usually to either a Clash or a Destruction.
Further, it has to be a Graveyard-Storage branch since elements in the Graveyard -Storage need to be Clashed to be released. Also, Ox and Dragon are the only two Branches that will release Water. As she herself points out in the book, her ‘eureka’ moment came in 2000, which was a Dragon year.
Addendum:
It’s significant that in the book, she notes that her first moment of attempting to find herself/god actually occurred much earlier, during a visit to Bali, and later to an island near Lombok. This provides an integral clue as to what is the Earthly Branch that holds the key to this BaZi. Earlier, it was established that the chart needs water but then the question is: WHICH WATER? Ren which represents Indirect Resource clearly is the answer, since the book, is definitely somewhat ‘flaky’ in it’s tone. And being a search for religion, self, visiting an ashram, is obviously about an Indirect Resource subject. 2003 itself was a Ren Wu year – so it clearly seems like Ren is the preferred, indeed, workable water.
But what the chart is actually telling her (via her book) is that the chart wants THE PIG.
THE. PIG.
亥 is the key to this chart. It calms the fires in this chart rather than putting them out with a splutter in the way Gui would. The presence of the Ji Earth Stem clearly tells us that Gui on the Stem isn’t the answer. Gui in the Branch (in the form of 子 is also not the answer since that just comes off as nasty against the Goat and the Horse, not to mention the Rooster). Pig on the other hand, brings the much needed Water. The combination also produces Wood, which whilst strictly speaking is not usable by Jia Wood, is still somewhat helpful to this weak Jia.
Looking at the book, it all makes sense. Her first revelation that she needed to end her relationship came after she visited Bali (crossed the 亥 )and whilst she was alone on the ISLAND (壬 all around). And during the year in which she spent in Italy, India and Bali, she was essentially crossing the sea every three months.
亥 again.
Pig is also great for the Xin, which is her Direct Officer Star.
Marriage Failure
The failure of the relationship at this point can be explained by the effect of the Luck Pillar very clearly. Jia Xu in itself is the Graveyard of Metal, denoting a relationship with a Spouse naturally in itself comes to an end here. Xu also harms the You in the chart, which represents the Spouse Star. The rebound effect of David can be seen from the Geng Chen and Xin Si annual pillars that appeared. The metal however cannot survive the Fire in the chart come the Ren Wu year, which further intensifies the Fire in her chart, and also creates a self-punishment with the Spouse Palace.
Part of the early chapters of the book also indicate that Gilbert faced inordinate difficulty with getting her spouse to agree to a divorce. This is easy to see – firstly, Jia Xu in itself denotes lots of obstacles, especially with matters related to money and property, and as the Spouse Star is involved in the interaction, it is clear that it has some connection to the marriage. Further, in her chart, Fire is extremely strong, particularly Ding Fire. The Xin, which represents her Direct Officer Star, is surrounded by 7 killings. Thus, her Spouse was a nice person up until the point he felt he had been crossed or betrayed by her leaving. And Xin likes to use Water, particularly Hurting Officer. So, her Spouse was being difficult both to prove a point and also because, the character of the Spouse is inherently spiteful (a basic quality of the 7 Killings Star).
The divorce settles in Gui Wei because this denotes the end of a legal problem for the Spouse (thus, the divorce finally concludes) but also, indicates that he decides for his own reasons (most likely he was also getting tired of it – Indirect Resource denotes a somewhat random, often unexplainable reason or reaction) to conclude the deal. She however is helped by the presence of Gui Water, which helps to calm down the Fire in the chart, and also is favourable to both her and her Spouse.
In the book, she meets someone new in the Jia Shen year. Although the book doesn’t say what happened to her relationship in the end, the nature of the relationship is clearly defined by the Jia Shen – a Friend + Boyfriend at the same time. (Gilbert has since married him – will it last past the Bing Zi Luck Pillar…)
Children
In the book, Gilbert talks about her realisation that she did not want children. The reason for this is also very clear in her chart. The Fire element (which represents children to a female) is extremely strong, overwhelmingly so. As such, the Day Master does not WANT any more of that element. Further in a Luck Pillar where the effect of the Fire element is amplified, makes the Star even more negative. And thus, naturally deters the Day Master from favouring that element (and thus, wanting more of it in life).
In stark contrast to the chart of Tony Hayward, soon to be ex CEO of BP, this person got fired.
And as stated in my entry on Tony Hayward, the reason why I was confident Mr Hayward would not get fired, was because the Officer Star does not appear to be affected in the chart. By contrast, in this example, you can clearly see that the Officer Star is negatively affected by the Luck Pillar which is Bing Wu 丙 午 . And the firing took place very close to the end of the Gui Wei 癸 未 month.
And the reason he was fired? Why, naturally, it was a woman. Nasty the Wu 午 can be.
So I decided to attempt to do a migration to a self-hosted blog on Saturday, Ji Chou day. And instantly the blog was hacked (wondering if it has anything to do with the Geng Yin Day the next day, which is a Fan Yin of the Month).
The format is still being mucked about with and I’m learning a lot about how to improve the security on the blog etc (although based on the account of the technical people, it does appears to have been just a combination of bad luck and a decidedly Indirect Resource type problem) - I’m having a great time wasting time figuring out how to make the blog look better, seem more interesting…I don’t think I’ve wasted this much time on my blog since…well, since it was set-up.
Anyway, I’ve finally managed to do some Facebook integration (big reason for the shift to a self-hosted blog) and I plan to do 10 minute Q&A sessions via the Facebook page. (an idea which I borrowed from this really cool personal trainer I follow on facebook called Craig Ballentyne). So keep a look out for that.
I do get asked this question sometimes, often by random people at social occasions. It is a very valid question and I think all BaZi practitioners (and Feng Shui practitioners out there) should have an answer to this question. It’s only fair.
I am also prompted to write this article upon reading the comments of Justice Johnson Lam, the presiding Judge in the Nina Wang probate case. His Lordship, in his judgment, saw fit to include the following comment:
Justice Lam also had some sobering words about feng shui. “As far as Hong Kong is concerned, any person can run a feng shui class or hold himself out as a feng shui practitioner or master,” the judge wrote. “There is no independent objective assessment, and thus no quality assurance whatsoever.”
- New York Times ‘Feng Shui Master is denied billionaire’s estate’
But before I get to the answer (and address Justice Lam’s point), I would like to pose this question:
How do you know the [insert profession of choice] is a Quack?
How do you know the doctor is a quack?
How do you know the lawyer is a quack?
How do you know the plumber is a quack?
How do you know the dentist is a quack?
* see definition of ‘quack‘ and ‘quackery‘
HOW DO YOU KNOW INDEED?
One argument is that all of the above (including the plumber) have certificates. Guess what – those can be faked or forged. Equally, not all doctors graduate from good medical schools. There are LOTS of lousy doctors out there.
And dentists. And engineers. And accountants. And lawyers.
But no one accuses someone who has failed in their duties in these profession as a ‘quack’. It is simply assumed that they know what they are doing, but are simply not very good at what they are doing.
So we don’t call them quack lawyers. They are just not very good lawyers.
WIKI defines ‘quackery’ (which obviously is the practice of a quack) as “”a person who pretends, professionally or publicly, to have skill, knowledge, or qualifications he or she does not possess; a charlatan.”
Non-quackery in essence is defined as possessing SKILL, KNOWLEDGE or QUALIFICATIONS.Quackery is the opposite: the lack (or the pretense) of the SKILL, KNOWLEDGE or QUALIFICATIONS to perform a particular job.
By this definition, lawyers can engage in quackery. So can doctors. Plumbers. Gardeners. Bodyguards.
A plumber who pretends to know what he is doing (when he doesn’t) IS A QUACK PLUMBER.
Now, as Justice Lam has pointed out, it is indeed difficult to ascertain if someone is qualified, skilled or knowledgeable in the field of Metaphysics because it lacks an independent verification body. However, I would argue also that most professions have bodies that serve to verify the credentials of an individual, but those bodies often comprise of individuals from that profession itself.
So, yes, the Bar Councils and Bars around the world serve to determine if a lawyer is qualified to practice law or not. But are they actually able to stop quack lawyers (by arguable definition, LOUSY lawyers)? Well, that depends on whether the Bar (or guild or association) is looking to serve the interests of it’s members (who may not want more people in to create competition) or to serve the interests of the public (who technically would want more choice since this means, prices go down) or to serve the interests that the public may not know (ie: lawyers are expensive for a reason).
And it goes on.
In a sense, the Metaphysics world is democratic. It says – here is all the knowledge. You can learn it if you want. But you live and die by your results. And the theory is that if you’re lousy, then you won’t survive. By contrast, the world of qualified professionals (like lawyers and judges) who pride themselves on their degrees as quality assurance, arguably can survive even if they are crap at their jobs. (seriously, how many of us know vaguely mediocre if not borderline only competent individuals in our own professions?)
And they are able to do so for the SAME reasons that quack FS and BaZi consultants can keep going on. Because no one really knows or understands, what they are doing and so cannot ask intelligent questions.
It’s like in the old days. If a doctor told you this was what was wrong with you, you accepted his judgment, took the medicine, and went home. If a lawyer tells you to plead guilty because you can’t win on the law, most people actually do that.
How is this different from quack FS and BaZi consultants?
It’s no different. Just that one group quacks with a professional qualification and some letters behind their name and a frame piece of parchment, and the other group does so with transcendent metaphysical mumbo-jumbo and a bit of smart psychology.
Its easy to abuse the trust of people out there, who sometimes when they come to a BaZi or Feng Shui practitioner, are hoping for a miracle. But hey, isn’t it the same with doctors?
People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. Why else are doctors now furious that patients come to their clinics having googled their symptoms in advance and asking smart questions? (okay, not always smart but sometimes smart?).
Quackery isn’t just restricted to Metaphysics. It’s EVERYWHERE.
If you’ve had a lousy plumber come and screw up your plumbing, you will understand what I mean. Quackery, like stupidity, does not discriminate across professions.
But coming back to my original point, how do you know if a BaZi consultant is a Quack?
I think the most obvious clue is in the prescription.
Obviously, if it involves any kind of ritual which involves getting naked/burying a box of gold in the backyard/sleeping with the practitioner, then not only should you be hearing the sound of a duck in your ears, you should be RUNNING FOR THE HILLS.
If it involves BUYING SOMETHING, this may not be quackery per se. It could be the consultant knows what they are saying, but are trying to make a few more bucks off you. However, if the prescription is ENTIRELY DRIVEN by buying something or many things, then…you should probably hear a quack or two in the background.
If the prescription is to buy something from the store outside and this is the ONLY THING YOU CAN DO TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM…
…the hills are alive with the sound of ducks and you should…RUN LIKE HELL.
To return to my original question: how do you know the BaZi consultant is a quack?
Well, honestly, unless you are informed, it is very hard to tell a real quack, from a moderate quack, from the Real McCoy.
Here are however some thoughts on what the Real McCoy might look and sound like – I do not provide any guarantee that they will enable you to for sure suss out the quacks (remember, quack here being not just someone who is clueless, but someone who may have read the book but not figured out the lesson), but they might go someway in helping you ask more intelligent and informed questions:
You are not necessarily getting a good consultant just because the consultant happens to tell you what you want to hear, or make you feel happy, or somehow justify your illusions of grandeur about life.
Unless of course, your idea of a good doctor is someone who doesn’t tell you that you’ve got some horrible illness and drastic action is needed if you don’t want to die.
The Ren Wu 壬 午 month pop quiz as you will recall featured this chart:
The chart belongs to Tony Hayward, the CEO of BP (until October, following which he will be transferred to TNK-BP)
Almost all of you picked up the Tiger-Snake clash and there were some weird funky attempts to reconcile the Rooster with the Rat in the Luck Pillar etc. To be honest, the answer was a LOT SIMPLER.
Tiger 寅 (Yin) is the Hurting Officer Star. In 2010, Hurting Officer and Direct Resource are in conflict. This means, that as a result of something you say (Hurting Officer being an expressive star), you hurt your Goodwill and Reputation.Specifically what you say is not POLITICALLY CORRECT, tactless, or simply too blunt and honest.
This is what he said, that is now widely regarded as the statement that pretty much ruined his tenure as CEO:
“we’re sorry for the massive disruption it’s caused to their lives. There’s no one who wants this thing over more than I do, I’d like my life back“
With regards the effect of the Tiger on the Snake in his chart, yes, this obviously affects his Wealth Star BUT everyone has given this an extremely narrow interpretation. The common interpretation given in the answers was that he would either lose his job or lose a lot of money.
Well, he hasn’t actually lost his job since he is still working for BP but is now being tasked to handle TNK-BP, BP’s extremely lucrative joint-venture in Russia AND he has received a GBP 600,000 pension per annum along with a year’s salary. That is HARDLY in my view, a loss of money in any sense.
So, where did the interpretation go wrong?
Firstly, it is false to assume that just because the Wealth Star is affected, that the job is necessarily affected. This is because employment relates not just to the DW star, but also relates to the DO star. As we only have a partial chart, we cannot know if he actually has a DO Star in the Stem of the Hour or in the Branch of the Hour that is affected. But suffice to say that there is nothing here to suggest the Direct Officer Star is actually significantly affected. As such, I did not think he would lose his job, because there is nothing to suggest Direct Officer is affected.
I also did not think he would be financially affected simply because whilst there is a Punishment Relationship between the Geng Yin and the double Snakes in the Chart, there is no ROB WEALTH STAR in the equation. How to lose the Wealth if it is not robbed?
(there was also a dose of common sense involved here – I knew who he was and frankly, no multi-national organisation in the world fires a long-standing company man just because a bunch of Yanks are severely pissed off and he made a major public relationship gaffe. You punish the person yes, but you don’t CAN them. They are simply too valuable at that level, and if he was sacked, there would probably be plenty of companies out there willing to hire him just for the sake of his expertise in having been at the center of the storm in this issue. The point being CONTEXT MATTERS.)
Now, let’s talk about what the Tiger-Snake punishment *really* means.
Direct Wealth relates to not just money, but your chattels and the things you are responsible for. In this case, the entire company is his responsibility. The Punishment is a Hurting Officer Star affecting a Direct Wealth Star – in itself, these two Stars are somewhat contrary to each other because one is the star of extreme conservatism, and the other is the star of outrageousness. So here, we have the Hurting Officer Star affecting the Direct Wealth Star – the person is overly boastful, and somewhat cavalier when it comes to the things that are under his care or which are his responsibility. He assumes that he has everything under control because Hurting Officer is the star of great confidence.
The Wiki account of the Deepwater Horizon incident shows that Hayward obviously under-estimated the nature of the problem, and then after that consistently downplayed it. His cavalier attitude could be seen in how he decided to go and watch his sailboat race rather than at least PRETEND to give a damn about the birds that were dying in the Gulf of Mexico, or all the people whose livelihoods were affected by the spill and explosion.
But that is the nature of Jia Wood Hurting Officers – it is a supremely tactless Hurting Officer. All Hurting Officers are tactless and blunt but the Jia Wood Hurting Officer is THE most tactless and THE most blunt, and worst of all, the most oblivious to the fact that what is being said is just digging them into a deeper hole. And in this case, Hayward’s tactlessness caused a fall from grace, but it did not cause him to lose his job. That is because Resource is affected and not officer, indicating a Reputation or Goodwill related problem, rather than an actual issue with employment.
Nice try to everyone who gave it a go but a bit of a miss.
Work has been voluminous of late, but I will be blogging more often now that my schedule has freed up a tad bit. Today’s entry arose out of a conversation I had with someone recently about the BaZi of a prospective employer. Our conversation was conducted over Blackberry Messenger so it sort of went something like this.
Him: is it okay for me to be employed by a Rat, born 17 xxxx . I was told it’s not okay for me to work for a Rat.
Me: That’s just superstition.
Him: So how?
Me: What exactly is it that you are concerned about vis-a-vis working for this person?
Him: Will I be able to work for him?
Me: Obviously the chart has some issues but the question is, what are you concerned about with regards working with him? What kind of problems do you NOT want to have?
Him: I don’t want to have problems with him like I have with the current boss.
Me: But you do realise that your chart shows that you will always have problematic bosses.
Him: I don’t want to work for someone who gives me vague instructions.
Me: Now we’re getting somewhere…
Now, what’s interesting about the conversation we had was that this person was asking me to check the BaZi of a prospective employer. That makes sense – it’s a good idea to know who you are going to work for. BUT, the crux of the issue was that he didn’t know what he wanted to know about the boss. He just asked a very vague and broad question: can I work for this person?
Now, the short and long of it is that the answer to any question along the lines of ‘Can I work for this person?’ has to be – surely that depends on whether or not you want the job/need the job? In the case of the individual who I was attempt to provide BaZi by Blackberry advice, he has always had the same problems in the past with bosses because in his chart, the Officer Star is a Star that is not favoured by his Day Master, which is Bing Fire.
So naturally he is keen to avoid ‘problems with the boss’ but yet, he does not actually know (until pressed) what is the problem that he wants to avoid.
In this case, I could foresee that his prospective employer might be facing some issues with partnership and potential legal issues. Is that going to affect him? Well it depends on exactly how he’s supposed to work with this future employer. Seeing as this person who sought my advice is a fairly senior management employee type, he obviously will be working very closely with his future employer as part of the senior management team. So the boss’s partnership issues and legal issues are likely to be his issues to some degree.
But the fundamental problem here is that this person simply has not been able to adjust or modify his expectations of his superiors, despite what his chart tells him. The fact is that HIS CHART shows that he will always work for the same TYPE of superior. So to expect something different each time around seems to be rather futile. And somewhat foolish.
But at the same time, to ask if you will be able to work well with someone, without really knowing what it is that you want out of that superior or what you are trying to avoid also is a rather unwise course of action. It comes back to my persistent siren call to clients, students, or anyone who asks me about BaZi. Don’t be vague. Be specific. If there is something in particular that you are trying to avoid, you need to know what it is.
Otherwise, how the hell do you know if that’s what you don’t want?